The Home-grown Prophet
The Gospel reading for today is one of the keys to
understanding Luke’s theology. In the
liturgy, the first part was read last week and the second part this week. We read Luke 4:14-28
14 Jesus
returned to Galilee in the power of the Spirit, and news about him spread
through the whole countryside. 15 He was teaching
in their synagogues, and everyone praised him.
16 He
went to Nazareth, where he had been brought up, and on the Sabbath day he
went into the synagogue, as was his custom. He stood up to read, 17 and
the scroll of the prophet Isaiah was handed to him. Unrolling it, he found the
place where it is written:
18 “The
Spirit of the Lord is on me,
because he has anointed me
to proclaim good news to the poor.
He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners
and recovery of sight for the blind,
to set the oppressed free,
19 to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favour.”
because he has anointed me
to proclaim good news to the poor.
He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners
and recovery of sight for the blind,
to set the oppressed free,
19 to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favour.”
20 Then
he rolled up the scroll, gave it back to the attendant and sat down. The
eyes of everyone in the synagogue were fastened on him.21 He
began by saying to them, “Today this scripture is fulfilled in your
hearing.”
22 All
spoke well of him and were amazed at the gracious words that came from his
lips. “Isn’t this Joseph’s son?” they asked.
23 Jesus
said to them, “Surely you will quote this proverb to me: ‘Physician, heal
yourself!’ And you will tell me, ‘Do here in your hometown what we have
heard that you did in Capernaum.’”
24 “Truly
I tell you,” he continued, “no prophet is accepted in his hometown. 25 I
assure you that there were many widows in Israel in Elijah’s time, when the sky
was shut for three and a half years and there was a severe famine throughout
the land. 26 Yet Elijah was not sent to any of
them, but to a widow in Zarephath in the region of Sidon. 27 And
there were many in Israel with leprosy in the time of Elisha the prophet,
yet not one of them was cleansed—only Naaman the Syrian.”
28 All
the people in the synagogue were furious when they heard this.29 They
got up, drove him out of the town, and took him to the brow of the hill on
which the town was built, in order to throw him off the cliff.30 But
he walked right through the crowd and went on his way.
Luke has Jesus arriving in his home town fresh from his
confrontation with the devil and a successful preaching tour of Galilee. Luke writes that ‘everyone praised him’.
Jesus, the observant Jew (as was his custom) joins the worshippers
in Synagogue on the Sabbath. He is
invited to read the haftarah from the
Prophets (Nevi’im).
There are a couple of questions here: Jesus could obviously read. It has been generally accepted that most
people of the time were illiterate.
However, more recent research questions this. Secondly, was Nazareth affluent enough to
have its own separate Synagogue and could afford to own a scroll of Isaiah. However, these are questions for another
time.
Jesus reads from the text of Isaiah 61:1-2 and his
commentary on this text proclaims that it is now fulfilled. At this time there were already messianic interpretations
of this text and these deeds were primary tenets of Judaism. No controversy there.
Note that his hearers were very impressed indeed - All spoke well of him and were amazed at the
gracious words that came from his lips. ‘Isn’t this Joseph’s son?’ they asked.
Now I must admit that I have taken their question ‘Isn’t
this Joseph’s son?’ as a rather cynical version of ‘Who do you think you are? You grew up here, we know you. Don’t get above yourself.’ However, in the context of their admiration,
this does not work.
So why does their admiration turn to hostility?
First of all, Jesus seems to provoke their hostility with
his response. He immediately sets out to
deflate their admiration and throws back the question, do here in your hometown what we have heard that you did in
Capernaum?
Do they want spectacle? Are they asking for the welfare of
the town? Do his Nazareth neighbours and relatives believe they are in a
privileged position because he is a local boy becoming famous for healing and
preaching? Can Jesus read their faces
and their minds as they listen to him? As
a perceptive communicator, he probably could.
However, more significant than that he knew the demands of social
connections which put family, clan, tribe, nation first in all obligations of
relationships.
He cites the stories of Elijah and the widow of Zarephath
and Elisha healing Naaman the Syrian – both foreigners. The context Jesus places these stories in is
that they received help and healing when Elijah and Elisha could have done the
same thing for their own people, Israel but went outside the borders instead.
It was the preferencing of the foreigner rather than those
of the prophets’ own tribe and nation that got Jesus’ listeners angry. It was not because gentiles received care –
the Jews had generally good relations with the Gentiles[i]
even to having the Court of the Gentiles in the Temple. Preferencing strangers would mean that the
social ties embedded in Jesus’ culture were being set aside.
At the heart of Jesus’ preaching and that of the early Jesus
community was profound inclusiveness and equality. The Reign of God was the priority and the
measure of all things. All shared an
equality of love, compassion, justice.
I suggest that this is what turned their admiration to
blazing, murderous anger. He placed his
townsfolk’s (probably most of Nazareth’s population were related or belonged to
the same tribe) assumption of social privileges though family and tribe in the context
of the Reign of God in which all people shared in the same privilege.
Consistently in the Gospels, Jesus replaces the priority of
social ties with that of the Reign of God.
He promises rewards to those who leave all for the Reign of God, he
praises Gentiles for their insights, praises the persistence of the Syrophoenician
woman for her love for her child. The
Reign of God demands priority and is the context for all relationships.
This is not to deny the embedded social ties, it is not to
reject family, culture or nation. These ties may be strengthened and transformed. It is
to see them all through the astounding and sometimes shocking inclusivity of
the Reign of God. There will be times
when social ties with be rejected or questioned, there will be times when we
question our culture and nation if we take this inclusivity seriously.
Trouble is, this universal sisterhood and brotherhood is
fine if they all look and think like me.
Now, there’s the daily conversion.
This is what the Lord Almighty
says: “In those days ten people from all languages and nations will take firm
hold of one Jew by the hem of his robe and say, ‘Let us go with you, because we
have heard that God is with you.’ Zechariah 8:23